Are home prices about to fall?

 
 

Here's how to make sense of this crazy housing market

We are at the point of the economic cycle where I really just get two questions: Are we going into recession and are home prices about to fall? I am going to do my best to try to make sense of what is happening with the housing market right now, since the years 2020-2024 have been a talking point of mine for years and my biggest concern since the fall of 2020 has been prices overheating — not having a deflationary collapse. 

For over a decade, a lot of people didn’t believe in housing inflation but in the deflationary housing story, which hasn’t ended well for them since 2012. Talking about this from a historical standpoint will help us understand better what is happening today.

I have separated my work into two different time frames: 2008-2019 and 2020-2024.

In the years 2008-2019 we saw the weakest housing recovery ever. I predicted that purchase application data wouldn’t reach 300 until years 2020-2024 and housing starts wouldn’t start a year at 1.5 million until then as well. In contrast, I knew 2020-2024 would have the best housing demographic patch ever as the country’s biggest demographic group hits the median age for first-time homebuyers.

Let’s look back at how some people have interpreted housing market data.

A short history of the housing crash narrative

2012: What they said: Shadow inventory will cause prices to fall. The reality: Inventory broke down in 2012, and the monthly supply data got below 6.0 months. The “shadow inventory” was not an issue as it took years to get rid of the distressed supply from the housing bubble years.

2013: What they said: Because mortgage rates were rising and the Fed was tapering, housing would crash. The reality: The 10-year yield shot up from 1.60% to 3% (sound familiar?), making housing cool down noticeably. Nominal home price growth cooled down, but we had no negative year-over-year price declines as inventory didn’t even get over five months back then.

2014: What they said: Housing would crash because purchase application data was down 20% year over year; adjusting to the population, it was the lowest ever. (Total inventory grew this year, and sales were negative. This was the last time total inventory did grow in America.) The reality: Even though sales fell and inventory grew, nominal home prices didn’t decline since the monthly supply of homes never came close to breaking over six months.

2015: What they said: This was the start of the Silver Tsunami. The first baby boomer turned 62 in 2008, and thus 2015 was the start of what they said would be a mass downsizing that would collapse prices because nobody could buy a home from the Boomers, and they needed to discount their net wealth by 70% to have a smaller home to live in. The reality: The Silver Tsunami didn’t happen; this was supposed to be a decade-long process up to 2025, and still hasn’t happened.

2016: What they said: Because manufacturing was in a recession, and stocks pulled back 15%, people were pushing a general recession premise. The reality: Home prices grew because inventory fell once again. (Here’s me on a treadmill challenging those calling for a recession.)

2017: What they said: Because home prices were back to the housing bubble peak, prices had to crash. The reality: Inventory fell again and home prices rose.

2018: What they said: With mortgage rates rising to 5% and the new home sales sector getting hit hard, housing would crash. The reality: The existing home sales marketplace was in much better shape. Sales fell, but the total inventory still didn’t grow. The monthly supply data increased as it took longer to buy homes: there was no inventory growth and purchase application data were only negative for three weeks out of this year.

2019: What they said: Housing would crash because Inventory was up year over year on the monthly supply data for a few months, and the sales trend was still falling. The reality: As rates fell, housing rebounded in the second half of 2019. I enjoyed the 2019 housing market because real home prices went negative briefly, and people had choices. Not many people liked this market, but it was as good as it gets because the days on the market climbed to over 30 days and we had no drama.

2020:
COVID-19 hit us and thus the housing crash premise went into overdrive. Even though I tried my best in 2019 to warn my housing bubble friends not to go there with a bubble crash, they did. I was willing to forgive them early on since it was our first global pandemic in recent history and the economy paused, leading to a drastic downturn in economic activity. What they said: COVID would lead to a housing crash. The reality: I wrote on April 7, 2020, we would have an economic recovery in 2020 if you follow these data lines and dates. Regarding housing, I said please wait until July 15 to see June’s data before you go all housing crash on us. They didn’t wait and missed the greatest recovery ever. I retired that economic recovery model on Dec. 9 2020, and now we were dealing with the Forbearance Crash Bros.

2021: What they said: After failing with another housing crash call, what do all crash call boys and girls do? They move the goal post to next year and the theme was forbearance —all the people coming off of forbearance would crash the housing market. The reality: Data was stable and most people making over $60,000 a year got their jobs back by October of 2020.

Now that we have that 10 years of history on the books, it’s time to talk about the future because the housing market has had a material change based on my own economic work.  One thing is for sure, demographics are economics, and mother demographics flexed her muscle during COVID-19. Ages 28-34 are the biggest age group ever and when you add them with move-up, move-down, cash, and investor buyers together, you have solid replacement demand.

This also means we might have problems with inventory as well. As you can see here with the NAR total inventory data, total inventory has been falling since 2014, but with a bump in demand, we had the potential to break under 1.52 million. Historically, 2 million to 2.5 million of inventory is normal. Post-2014, a slow but potential dangerous downtrend formed right when our demographic patch was about to kick in.

Read the full article here.

Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado

Search Homes in Oklahoma

Search Homes in Oregon

16 Colorado Springs properties combine to earn national recognition for leadership in outdoor stewardship

 
 

Our parks staff, community members, and partners are being recognized for taking care of our parks, trails, and open spaces!

The Leave no Trace Center has designated SIXTEEN of our incredible parks, trails and open spaces as Leave No Trace Gold Standard Sites!

Achieving Gold Standard means that our parks and people have set the bar for responsible recreation all across our community. We join an elite group of 13 parks nationwide to earn this national recognition for leadership in outdoor stewardship, and we are the first municipal site to receive this designation.

In order to be named a Gold Standard Site, the following criteria must be met:

  • Demonstrate successful implementation of Leave No Trace outdoor skills and ethics into management, programming, outreach and education efforts at the site

  • Formally train staff and community partners in Leave No Trace Outdoor Ethics

  • Include Leave No Trace language and messaging on signs at trailheads, visitor centers and campgrounds as well as in pamphlets, maps and other distributed materials for visitors

  • Facilitate Leave No Trace interpretive programs including ranger talks, campfire events and trail outings for visitors

The quality of support from our partners, stakeholders, volunteers, visitors and staff who helped us achieve this goal has been tremendous. Minimizing impacts in our world-class regional parks, trails and open spaces is a team effort, and we can’t thank our community enough for your active and ongoing support. This award is for all of us!

Here is the list of sites to receive the Gold Standard. Austin Bluffs Open Space, Blodgett Open Space, Bluestem Prairie Open Space, Corral Bluffs Open Space, @GardenoftheGods, High Chaparral Open Space, Manitou Incline, North Cheyenne Cañon Park, North Slope Recreation Area, Palmer Park, Red Rock Canyon Open Space, Sinton Pond Open Space, Sondermann Park, South Slope Recreation Area, Stratton Open Space and Ute Valley Park.

Leave No Trace is nonprofit organization at provides innovative education, skills, research and science to help people care for the outdoors. By working with the public and those managing public lands, Leave No Trace focuses on educating people as the most effective and least resource-intensive solution to land protection.

“Leave No Trace is thrilled to announce the City of Colorado Springs Regional Parks, Trails and Open Spaces as a designated Gold Standard Site,” said Dana Watts, Leave No Trace executive director. “The hard work of staff and local community stakeholders means that the City of Colorado Springs is a leading force in the Leave No Trace movement nationally and an example of how effective the role of education is in protecting our public lands. It was a particularly ambitious move to nominate 16 properties for this designation, and Colorado Springs should be proud of its efforts to promote outdoor stewardship across its entire park system.”

Learn more about the Leave No Trace program in Colorado Springs at ColoradoSprings.Gov/lnt

Read more about the Colorado Springs trails!

Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado

Denver lands in the top 10 best large cities for renters, report shows

 
 

On average, Denver residents have 553 square feet per renter.

Denver is the nation's ninth-best large city for renters, while two neighboring cities are among the nation's top 50 cities for renters, according to a recent report from RentCafe's report.

With quality of life and cost of living as two of the main categories determining the overall rankings, Westminster and Colorado Springs found themselves as the 35th and 46th top overall cities for renters, respectively, while Denver snagged 36th.

According to RentCafe, Denver's local economy was the best performing category that landed it as the No. 9 best large city for renters and having the 18th-highest number of highly rated schools helped boost the Mile High City's ranking, RentCafe said. Jacksonville, Florida, took the No. 1 spot, representing the south that dominated the rankings. Cities in Florida and Texas made up 50% of the overall report's Top 10 best large cities for renters.

Round Rock, Texas, secured the No. 1 spot for overall best cities for renters, however, Colorado held its ground against the south across the board in other rankings. Colorado Springs was ranked the No. 8 best mid-sized city for renters, which saw Raleigh, North Carolina, come in as the No. 1 city with quality of life as the top-performing category. Trailing briefly behind Colorado Springs as the No. 10 best mid-sized city for renters is Tulsa, Oklahoma, which has lured tech professionals out of Denver.

While Denver's average renter's income is $59,499 with a citywide unemployment rate of 4.3%, according to RentCafe, 26.6% of the city's apartments are in top locations. RentCafe's source, Yardi Matrix, defines "top locations" using a number of factors including education of area household heads and well-maintained housing development.

On average, Denver residents have 553 square feet per renter, while Lakewood renters have 611 square feet, and those in Westminster have 519 square feet, according to a May report from RentCafe.

On average in Denver, $1,500 will get renters a 681-square-foot apartment, whereas in Aurora it will earn renters 792 square feet, RentCafe reports.

While rent is on the rise in Denver and Coloradans worry about the cost of living, Denver has the ninth-highest share of newly built apartments (25%), according to RentCafe.

Westminster appeared in RentCafe's rankings due to 51% of their apartments being located in coveted spots and averaging 861 square feet while the local economy is seeing 5.5% job growth.

Learn more.

Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado

$10,000 grant for high-efficiency home rebuilds offered after Marshall, East Troublesome fires

 
 

A new bill signed into law by Gov. Jared Polis offers residents whose homes were destroyed by the Marshall or East Troublesome fires a $10,000 grant to help Coloradans build high-efficiency electric homes or long-term rental units.

The grant, offered through Senate Bill 22-206, will be the first grant program from the Colorado Energy Office for homes lost in the Marshall and East Troublesome fires, according to a news release from Boulder County. The bill also established an Office of Climate Preparedness that will take a long-term approach to wildfire mitigation.

To qualify for the funding, the rebuilt homes must use heat pumps for space heating, electric stoves which includes either electric resistance or induction, and heat pump water heaters, the release said. Incidental gas use for equipment, such as fireplaces or grills, is allowed. Homes must be built to the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code standards, Boulder County’s BuildSmart standards for unincorporated Boulder County, or stronger standards in order to earn the incentive.

The details of timing and program administration are still being finalized and will be shared on RebuildingBetter.org when they are available, the release stated. The incentive from the Colorado Energy Office may be added to the incentive program offered by Xcel Energy for Marshall Fire victims.

EnergySmart, Boulder County’s free residential energy efficiency advising program, has hired Robby Schwarz as a dedicated Marshall Fire new homes building advisor. Schwarz’s advising services are available at no cost to homeowners, builders, code officials, trade partners, and others.

For more information call 303-544-1000 or email info@EnergySmartYes.com.

EnergySmart is hosting a virtual meeting for builders and architects supporting Marshall Fire rebuilding efforts at 9 a.m. on Thursday. The meeting is an opportunity to learn about the latest homeowner and builder rebates, grants and discounts available for Marshall Fire projects. Registration for the meeting can be completed at bit.ly/3OlgOxV.

Learn more here.

Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado

How's Denver for first-time homebuyers? It could be worse.

 
 

Six Colorado cities made it into a 2022 report of best cities for first-time homebuyers.

Denver might not be the best place to shop for first-time homebuyers, but it certainly isn't the worst.

Denver is ranked No. 58 best city for first-time homebuyers to purchase, according to a new SmartAsset report.

While cost of living is on the rise and a big concern for many Coloradans, the state made a splash in the report, with Fort Collins jumping from the No. 32 best city for first-time homebuyers in 2021 to No. 27 this year, while Colorado Springs took the No. 33 spot for 2022.

The report names Bellevue, Washington as the No. 1 spot for first-time homebuyers for 2022, but Denver-area suburbs continued to make a dent down the list: Lakewood is No. 76, Thorton is No. 84 and Aurora is No. 101.

The report compared 181 total cities across four categories: home market favorability, affordability, livability and employment. Denver's lowest-scoring category was livability, which takes into consideration the concentration of dining and entertainment establishments, violent crime rates and average commute times, the latter of which are on the rise in Denver as people return to offices.

The average cost of living in Denver as of the first quarter of 2022 was $3,537.73, a 12.9% increase from the same period in 2019. The Denver metro area is expected to hit the $1 million average price for a home soon.

Denver's affordability may be impacting the population, which shrunk by 6,167 people in the year ending July 2021. However, Denver is still a popular place to visit and a recent Zillow report found a Colorado suburb was the real estate website's third most popular market.

The home market favorability score, which measures the price-to-rent ratio, five-year home value appreciation and foreclosure rate, was Denver's best performing category in the SmartAsset report.

RECOMMENDED

FOOD & LIFESTYLE

Full Plate: 12 special food-and-beverage offerings for Father's Day

BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES

CrossFirst pays $75M cash for bank with operations in Colorado, New Mexico

RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE

CBJ Morning Buzz: Charlotte ranks among worst markets for first-time homebuyers; Indie movie theater sets debut in NoDa

Denver also ranked poorly when judged on employment, which the report based on the March 2022 unemployment rate and five-year change in median household income. The city has one of the largest gaps between median income and income needed to live comfortably.

Keep reading.

Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado