Colorado's mountain resorts announce last days for ski season

 
 

Colorado's mountain resorts are starting to close, though several of the large destinations are aiming to stay open into May.

Depending on snow conditions and any other major winter storms in the mountains, the dates may be pushed further into the spring season.

As of now, these are the dates each ski resort has reported it plans to close:

  • Arapahoe Basin: TBD date in June

  • Aspen Highlands: Closed

  • Aspen Mountain: April 24

  • Beaver Creek: April 17

  • Breckenridge: TBD date in May

  • Buttermilk: Closed

  • Chapman Hill Ski Area: Closed

  • Cooper: April 17

  • Copper Mountain: April 24

  • Cranor Ski Hill: Closed

  • Crested Butte: Closed

  • Echo Mountain: April 17

  • Eldora: April 17

  • Granby Ranch: Closed

  • Hesperus: Closed

  • Howelsen Hill: Closed

  • Kendall Mountain: TBA

  • Keystone: April 17

  • Lake City Ski Hill: Closed

  • Lee’s Ski Hill: Closed

  • Loveland: TBD date in early May

  • Monarch: April 17

  • Powderhorn: Closed

  • Purgatory: April 17

  • Silverton: April 17

  • Snowmass: April 17

  • Steamboat: Closed

  • Sunlight: Closed

  • Telluride: Closed

  • Winter Park: TBD date in mid-May

  • Wolf Creek: April 17

  • Vail: May 1

Keep reading.

Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado

Waiting on the Housing Market to Crash? Don’t.

 
 

Here’s How Today’s Market Is Different From the Great Recession Housing Bubble

Home prices are higher than they’ve ever been, and they show no signs of stopping. 

The median U.S. home listing price was $405,000 in March 2022, the first time it’s broken the $400,000 price threshold, according to data from Realtor.com. That is an increase of 26.5% over two years. 

Homebuyers might see similarities between what’s happening today and the 2006 housing market where home prices became increasingly unaffordable until the bubble burst, helping trigger the worldwide financial crisis we came to call the Great Recession.

Stressed-out buyers might be thinking these high prices are a bubble just waiting to pop again. In fact, 77% of homebuyers believe there’s a bubble where they live, according to a recent Redfin survey. 

Today’s market differs significantly from what happened 15 years ago, when high home prices were instead driven by loose lending practices and rampant investor speculation in the market. 

Waiting for the market to crash might not yield the results buyers hope for, experts say. “There’s not really any room for there to be a bubble right now. It’s not like people have borrowed too much and it’s not like homes are overvalued,” says Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at Redfin. 

There are a lot of reasons why it seems like we are in a bubble, but at its heart, the issue is simple: supply and demand are driving up prices. “It’s just that there aren’t enough homes for everybody who wants one,” says Fairweather.

Here’s what is different about today’s market, what’s behind the record-high prices, and what buyers can do to navigate the process. 

Things Have Changed Since 2006

The current market and that of the mid-2000s share some similarities. Namely, housing prices were up and often unaffordable for buyers. The causes are different, experts say.

The previous bubble came after a period in which lenders were more lax about writing loans and more people were in the housing market as an investment rather than to buy a home to live in. “Mortgage underwriting was considerably more loose back in 2006,” says Robert Dietz, chief economist at the National Association of Home Builders. “It was easier to get a mortgage to speculate in the housing market. That is not the case today.”

Different home loans, such as adjustable-rate mortgages with big “balloon payments” due at the end of the term, meant people got into homes thinking they could afford the payments, finding out later that their payments grew dramatically to unaffordable levels, Fairweather says. “There was a lot of financial engineering, there was a lot of predatory lending, there was a lot of bad borrowing on people not having a lot of equity, not having as much of a cushion, that led to the housing bubble,” she said.

Those types of loans are far less common today, and there is more oversight of home lending in the wake of the crisis of the late 2000s, experts say. Today, most borrowers get 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, which don’t come with the risk of payments suddenly rising dramatically as rates increase, Fairweather says. “If you own a home, you’re still paying what you paid when you got your fixed-rate mortgage.”

There Aren’t Enough Homes

There are two major ways homes enter the market: Somebody builds a new one or somebody sells an old one. Both of those pipelines are a bit out of whack. “Today it’s really just about lack of supply,” Dietz says.

Builders Are Struggling to Catch Up

The limited supply of new homes is due to factors both old and new, Dietz says. For the last decade, builders haven’t put up houses at the rate they needed to in order to handle today’s demand, which he says has probably created a deficit of at least a million homes. At the same time, costs have gone up since the pandemic. Deitz blames the constraints in the market to what he calls the “five Ls”: 

  • Labor: Builders are having a hard time finding skilled workers, particularly in hot markets such as Texas.

  • Lots: There’s about a year’s supply of lots available, when the market needs two to three years.

  • Lending: Homebuilders, especially the smaller companies, face a tighter market for borrowing the money needed to build.

  • Lumber and building materials: Lumber prices were about $350 per thousand board feet in January 2020. That’s about $1,300 now, Dietz says. On top of lumber, there are shortages and delays in things like garage doors and microwaves.

  • Laws and regulations: Issues like zoning can limit how many homes can be built in a certain amount of space.

The tight housing market means new construction is even more important for buyers trying to get a home. While new homes typically account for less than one in 10 sales, that figure is now about one in three, Deitz says. Supply chain issues also mean new homes take longer to build – from a typical time of about six and a half months to now about eight months. 

“When you add all those together, it’s just gotten a lot harder to build homes,” he says.

Fewer People Are Selling

Existing homes make up most of the market, but the supply of those is down also. Some of that has to do with the affordability issues affecting buyers. A survey by Discover Home Loans found 79% of homeowners would rather renovate their homes than move

High home prices might seem to encourage people to sell their homes and cash in, but most of those people would have to buy another home, and pay those high costs. “If they try to buy again, they’ll be facing a really tough market as a buyer,” Fairweather says. “The only people who are really in a good position to sell and buy again are people who are downsizing or moving to a more affordable area.”

There Are More Buyers

The supply constraints mean there aren’t as many homes for people to compete for, but those open houses are also busier than ever. That’s because more people are deciding homeownership is right for them at the moment. 

“There’s a lot of demand for homes right now,” Fairweather says. “A lot of people are looking.”

Part of that is that millennials are entering their prime homebuying years, experts said. Many members of this big generation are in their 30s, often married with children. “We are seeing a big push from millennials to buy a home,” Fairweather says. “That has been years in the making.”

The pandemic has also made remote and hybrid work a possibility for many. That means you don’t have to live close to an office and you might need more space than you can find in an apartment. Remote work means owning a home is a possibility for more people, Fairweather says, adding to demand. 

When Will the Housing Market Calm Down?

It will likely take a while before the inventory of available homes matches up with demand. Experts surveyed by Zillow predicted it’ll be two years before monthly inventory returns to pre-pandemic norms. They estimated it could be 2024 or 2025 before the portion of first-time buyers again reaches the 45% seen in 2019.

Rising mortgage rates – they’ve gone from near 3.3% at the start of the year to near 5% in just three months – will likely take some buyers out of the market and slow the rise of home prices. “It should weaken demand, but there’s so much demand it’s hard to say how much it will really impact things like sales and home prices,” Fairweather says.

Higher mortgage rates might not directly lead to lower prices – supply and demand will still be the big factors – but it could make life a little bit easier for buyers, Dietz says. “The bidding wars are going to cool off.”

Widen your search if you can. If you work remotely or are only in an office a few days a week, don’t worry about being as close to work as you might if you had to commute every day.

The factors driving up prices aren’t likely to subside anytime soon, Dietz says. “I don’t think buyers should be betting on any really significant price declines. If anything, as interest rates move higher, the cost of buying a home is going to go up.”

What Can Homebuyers Do In This Market

As Redfin’s survey found, many buyers think the market is in a bubble right now, and they might be tempted to wait for it to burst, some economic cataclysm that suddenly makes a house affordable. Experts caution against hoping for that.

“I think you want to be strategic and you want to be patient,” Dietz says. “Patient is different from waiting for a crash.”

Buyers will have to look harder and widen their search, he says. There are ways to get creative: If your work is hybrid and you only have to go to an office two or three times a week, reconsider your commute and think about it on a weekly basis rather than as a daily burden. That means you could look farther away from work where housing is sometimes cheaper. 

You can also consider other options, Dietz says. One is to look at new construction if you haven’t already. Keep in mind there is a longer lag time than usual, but it could be easier than competing for scarce existing homes with the mob of other potential buyers (and investors and flippers with cash offers). There are also options other than the usual single-family home, such as townhouses.

Any slowdown caused by higher mortgage rates will make the market a little easier for buyers who are patient, Fairweather says. “By end of summer there should be more homes on the market as not as many buyers will be taking them off the market,” she says.

The market could be in for a shift this year as it copes with higher mortgage rates, Fairweather says. You may want to slow down and consider your options. “I don’t think it’s wise to try to rush the market now because right now the market is adjusting,” she says. - Time


Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado

Search Homes in Oklahoma

Search Homes in Oregon

How to address rising property taxes in Colorado is a messy debate

 
 

Stop us if you've heard this one before: Colorado leaders agree something needs to be done, but they can't agree on what to do.

What's new: The issue is property taxes.

  • Lawmakers and advocates acknowledged they are at an impasse on how to address an issue with billion-dollar consequences.

  • "What you're seeing is a population of ideas to fill this vacuum, and I think it's a mess," said Bell Policy Center's Scott Wasserman.

Why it matters: Residential and commercial tax bills are rising exponentially with corresponding increases in housing valuations, generating concerns about affordability and gentrification.

  • But property taxes help fund schools, fire districts and local government initiatives — the programs most visible from our own front yards. So any change would likely affect them.

State of play: The debate is headed toward the November ballot for the third straight year, as outside organizations seek to remedy what the Democratic-led state Legislature has been unable to resolve.

The potential measures include:

  • A 3% limit to property valuation increases backed by Colorado Concern, a prominent business advocacy organization.

  • A 2% annual cap on property tax hikes pushed by conservatives activists.

  • A special tax for luxury homes and big businesses put forward by the liberal Bell Policy Center.

Between the lines: Colorado lawmakers are attempting a grand compromise — or at least a temporary one — to prevent a collision of conflicting measures.

  • The $36.4 billion state budget being debated sets aside $200 million, which could be used to extend existing property tax breaks or create new ones.

John's quick take: In eight years of tracking this issue, I've never seen such a lack of direction at this point in an election year.

What to watch: With the session entering its final weeks, legislative leaders still have no idea what will take shape.

  • "The question is how can we get to the sweet spot so a ballot initiative doesn't have to be considered this fall," says Senate Majority Leader Dominick Moreno (D-Commerce City). "I think the challenge is that no one knows who we are negotiating with anymore."

Stay up to date on news like this on Axios.

Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado

Another built-to-rent, single-family home community planned in Colorado Springs

 
 

The built-to-rent concept — single-family homes constructed as rental properties — might be gaining momentum in Colorado Springs.

The Empire Group, a Scottsdale, Ariz., residential and commercial real estate company, plans to develop a 228-unit, built-to-rent community on the Springs' northeast side, according to a proposal submitted last month to city government planners.

It would be the area's second recently proposed built-to-rent community. In February, Continental Properties of suburban Milwaukee submitted a plan to city officials that shows construction of 123 single-family rental homes, also on the Springs' northeast side.

Built-to-rent projects have soared in popularity nationwide over the last several years, according to news articles and real estate industry publications. They feature single-family, detached homes that are constructed with the express purpose of renting them as if they're apartments.

The communities appeal to renters who want a maintenance-free lifestyle and amenities similar to large apartment complexes. Yet built-to-rent communities also typically provide larger living spaces and the privacy that comes with single-family homes.

Developers have ramped up construction of built-to-rent communities in response to growing interest by renters, some of whom don't want to own a home or can't qualify for a mortgage. And because of the strong demand, developers can command rental rates of thousands of dollars a month.

Empire Group officials couldn't be reached for comment. The company's website shows it has completed or is finishing at least seven similar Phoenix-area built-to-rent projects with a total of about 1,500 rental units.

The company's project in Colorado Springs, to be called the Village at Cottonwood Creek, would be developed on nearly 26 acres northeast of Powers Boulevard and Woodmen Road, according to its proposal submitted to city officials.

Village at Cottonwood Creek would be a gated community of one-, two- and three-bedroom properties, ranging from 680 to 1,300 square feet, Empire's proposal shows.

Of the 228 units, 150 would be two- and three-bedroom single-family, detached homes; the 78 one-bedroom units would be built as duplexes — two units per building.

"Every home in the community will be single-story with a modern, open floor plan design, including vaulted ceilings, abundant natural light and a private outdoor patio and backyard," according to Empire's proposal.

Homes would be arranged "in architectural clusters to encourage interaction, while also maintaining personal privacy," the proposal says.

Amenities would include a pool and spa, barbeque areas, a dog park, washing areas for cars and pets, open space recreation areas, car-charging stations for electric vehicles, trash compactors and valet garbage service.

Every home also would include a doggy-door access to a backyard. Smart-home technology packages would feature video doorbells, keyless entry systems and remote- controlled security and HVAC systems, according to Empire's proposal.

  A community center would have a state-of-the-art fitness center and gathering space to accommodate community events or private gatherings.

Parking would include a mix of uncovered, covered, garage and accessible spaces, while residents also would be able to rent on-site storage units.

"Most importantly, the community management will be responsible for all maintenance of amenities and landscaping including individual patios and backyard areas," Empire's proposal says.

Empire's proposal doesn't spell out a timetable for its Colorado Springs project. It also doesn't include rental rates, though one Phoenix-area project shown on the company's website lists monthly rents ranging from $1,495 for a one-bedroom, one-bathroom unit with 671 square feet to $2,375 for a three-bedroom, two-bathroom unit of 1,282 square feet.

Get more Colorado Springs news on The Gazette.

Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado

Americans unlikely to lose homes if real estate bubble bursts

 
 

Collectively, US households have gained about $2.5 trillion in excess savings during the pandemic and more than half of US states recorded their strongest-ever personal income growth in 2021.

Housing affordability may be plummeting — but that doesn't mean Americans are likely to lose their homes if the real estate bubble bursts.

Home prices have soared to new highs as buyers continue to duke it out for the limited amount of homes available for sale. As the imbalance widens, fears of a second foreclosure crisis, like the one in 2008, have flooded financial markets.

Odeta Kushi, the chief economist at First American, thinks that's unlikely to happen for two reasons. Both have to do with the fact that homebuyers are in a far better financial position than they were in 2008.

"First, the housing market is in a much stronger position compared with a decade ago," Kushi told Insider. "Accompanied by more rigorous lending standards, the household debt-to-income ratio is at a four-decade low and household equity near a three-decade high."

The debt-to-income ratio is a common measure of financial health that compares the total amount of debt a person owes each month to their income. It is considered in mortgage applications.

Despite inflation surging to a 40-year high in February, Americans still have a tremendous amount of wealth. Collectively, households have gained about $2.5 trillion in excess savings during the pandemic and more than half of US states recorded their strongest-ever personal income growth in 2021. With the average mortgage borrower currently owning about $185,000 in tappable home equity — the amount of money a homeowner can access while retaining at least 20% equity in their homes — the Covid-19 housing market hardly resembles the housing bubble that gave rise to the 2008 foreclosure crisis. 

Holden Lewis, an analyst at NerdWallet, told Insider he agrees.
"When the housing market crashed in 2008 and 2009, it was because many people owed more than their houses were worth," Lewis said. "So when they couldn't afford to make their payments, they lacked the ability to sell their homes, pay off their mortgages, and start over. They ended up in foreclosure instead."
That's not going to happen this time, he says. According to Lewis, the real estate market is in a far better position as banks and lenders have raised the standards for acquiring loans. 

"In 2008, the saying was that if you could fog a mirror, you could get a mortgage," he said. "Lending standards were lax, and borrowers didn't even need to prove that they earned enough money to afford their monthly payments."

Lending standards are stricter now than they were in 2008. The US government has since enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to help prevent some of the predatory lending practices that spurred the subprime mortgage crisis. No-money-down mortgages are almost unheard of and borrowers have to go through larger hoops to qualify for a mortgage.

All these factors combined with historically high home prices and robust homebuyer demand means American homeowners are sitting pretty. 

"If buyers can't afford to pay their mortgages, they can sell their homes, pay off their mortgages in full, and avoid foreclosure," Lewis said. "There will be few foreclosures for the foreseeable future, and that means a housing crash is unlikely."

Read more like this on Business Insider.

Related Links

If there is a home that you would like more information about, if you are considering selling a property, or if you have questions about the housing market in your neighborhood, please reach out. We’re here to help.

Search Homes in Colorado

Search Homes in Oklahoma

Search Homes in Oregon